شرح الفريدة بين السيوطي والتنبكتي - دراسة نحوية
Explanation of Al-Fareedah between Al-Suyuti and Al-Tunbukti: A Grammatical Study
- الباحث
- جنان أحمد حمود علي
- المشرف
- صالح علي شيخ علي
- الجامعة
- جامعة الموصل
- الكلية / القسم
- التربية للعلوم الإنسانية / اللغة العربية
- الشهادة
- ماجستير
- السنة
- 2022
- لغة الرسالة
- A
- الكلمات المفتاحية
- الفريدة;السيوطي;التنبكتي;النحو
Abstract
The present study entitled: " Explanation of AlFareedah Between AlSuyoti and AlTunbakti – A grammatical study" shed light on the commentaries of the most famous Alfeyyah (a thousand verses poem) by Ibn Malik (672 A.H.) that the scholars know, which is the AlFeyyah of AlFareedah) that dealt with the commentaries of (AlMatalea' AlSaeedah Fi Sharh AlFareedah) written by Jalal AlDeen AlSuyoti (911 A.H.) and (AlMinah AlHameeda Fi Sharh AlFareedah) written by Mohammed Baba AlTunbakti (1014 A.H.) that dealt with the methodology, fundamentals and the grammatical thinking as the main pillars of any grammatical study and it used the descriptive and analytical methodology as it is the most convenient with the grammatical study. The importance of this study pivots on four axes: the first is its relation to the Alfeyyah known by the scholars, which is Alfeyyat Ibn Malilk (the summary), the second is its connection with the encyclopedic scholar Imam AlSuyoti, the third is revealing an unknown brilliant scholar who is AlTunbakti and the fourth is uncovering two explanations which was not tackled by many scholars. The study consisted of an introduction, a preface, three chapters and a conclusion. In the introduction the importance of the subject was dealt with in addition to the reasons that made the researcher choose it, plan of the research, methodology and the most prominent references. The preface included to sub-sections; the first dealt with the commentators and the second tackled AlFareedah and its commentaries. Chapter one discussed the methodology of the two commentators in terms of presenting the scientific material and involved three sections; the first investigated the main characteristics of the methodology, the second discussed the grammatical references mentioned in the two commentaries, while the third was the comments of AlTunbakti on AlSuyoti. Moreover, chapter two tackled the fundamentals of the grammatical thinking for the commentators and its first section dealt with the hearing and the second discussed the comparison and measurement, but the third investigated the collective opinions of scholars. Chapter three discussed the grammatical thinking of the commentators and included three sections as well. Section one tackled the interpretation, the second dealt with justification and the third tackled the grammatical doctrine. Finally the research was ended with a conclusion B which showed the most important findings of the study with general indices that involved the grammatical evidences and the reference from which the study derived its material.
طلب نسخة من الملف
الملفات غير منشورة على الموقع. اترك بياناتك وسيتواصل معك موظفو قسم الشؤون الثقافية والفنون لإرسال النسخة مجاناً.