أثر أسلوبين إرشاديين (توكيد الذات - العلاج الواقعي) في تنمية المناعة النفسية لدى طلبة جامعة الموصل
The Effect of Two Counselling Styles (Self Assertion - Realistic Therapy) on Developing the Psychological Immunity of Mosul University Students
- الباحث
- رياض حازم فتحي عبد الله الدلي
- المشرف
- أحمد يونس محمود البجاري
- الجامعة
- جامعة الموصل
- الكلية / القسم
- التربية للعلوم الإنسانية / العلوم التربوية والنفسية
- الشهادة
- دكتوراه
- السنة
- 2022
- لغة الرسالة
- A
- الكلمات المفتاحية
- الأساليب الإرشادية;توكيد الذات;العلاج الواقعي;المناعة النفسية
Abstract
The current research aims at building a didactic program using the two styles of )self assertion and the realistic therapy) and identifying their effect on developing the Psychological immunity for Mosul University students by means of verifying the following hypotheses: 1. There are no statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the Psychological immunity averages for the three groups of the research (the first expperimental group with the style of self assertion, the second experimental group using the realistic therapy style and the control group) A- There are no statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the average ranks of the Psychological immunity variable for the first experimental group using the style of self assertion and the second experimental group using the realistic therapy. B- There are no statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the average ranks of the Psychological immunity variable for the first experimental group using the style of self assertion and the control groups. B C- There are no statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the averages of ranks for the Psychological immunity variable for the second experimental group using the style of realistic therapy and the control individuals. 2. There are no statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the averages of ranks for the Psychological immunity variable for the first experimental group using the style of self assertion in the pre - post measurement. 3. There are no statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the averages of ranks for the Psychological immunity variable for the individuals of the first experimental group using the style of Psychological immunity in the pre measurement and the post measurement. In order to accomplish the objectives and the hypotheses of the research, the researcher used the experimental method (designing the equivalent groups with pre and post measurements). The sample of the research consisted of (36) male and female students, who were diagnosed as having low level of Psychological immunity. The researcher chose the first grade students at the department of Geography, College of Education for Humanities at Mosul University after making the equivalence in a set of variables and they were divided into three equivalent groups. The researcher used self assertion with the first experimental group and used the realistic therapy with the second experimental group, while the third group (the control group) was not submitted to any counselling style. To measure the dependent variable, represented by the Psychological immunity, the researcher prepared a scale for this purpose that was build in accodance with Likert's method. The scale consists of (48) items distributed to three domains, namely (the religious commitment, Psychological resillience and will strength). The validity of the content and the construction of this scale were verified. From the other hand, invariability was determined using the retestng method and the correlation coefficient was (0.781) also, the researcher calculated the invariability using Alfachronbach equation for the internal consistency and it was (0.814) and also calculated the strength of distiction for all the items. The researcher used a counselling program to develop the Psychological immunity for the University students and it was presented in two styles, which are: D - Self assertion, which involved the following strategies: (role playing, free expression of opinion, social consolidation, modeling, emotions demonstration, positive talk with the self, feedback, discussion and homework). - Realistic therapy style: The researcher used the following techniques and strategies: (subject presentation, the realistic steps to learn the behavior, a model for behavioral responsibility, a question from the reality, activity and fun, relearning, specifying the homework and self- evaluation). The sessions of the program were (13) for each counselling style and each of the sessions lasted for (45) minutes except for the acquaintance and the final sessions. These sessions lasted for (12) weeks and the two styles of counselling were verified by submitting them to an elite of experts in psychology and Psychological guidance. The researcher conducted the posttest for the two experimental groups after applying the two styles to make sure of their effect on developing the Psychological immunity for the university students. The study needed to use multiple statistical tools including (Pearson's correlation coefficient, T test for two independent samples, E Chi square, Alfacronbach coefficient, Wilcokson's test, Man Whitney's test and Croscal and Alice test). The researcher reached the following findings: - There are no statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the average ranks of the Psychological immunity variable for the first experimental group using the style of self assertion and the second experimental group that uses the realistic therapy. - There are statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the average ranks of the Psychological immunity variable for the first experimental group using the style of self assertion and the control group. (In favor of the experimental group using the style of self assertion). - There are statistically significant differences at (0.05) level of significance between the average ranks of the Psychological immunity variable for the second experimental group using the realistic therapy and the individuals of the control group. (In favor of the second experimental group using the style of the realistic therapy).
طلب نسخة من الملف
الملفات غير منشورة على الموقع. اترك بياناتك وسيتواصل معك موظفو قسم الشؤون الثقافية والفنون لإرسال النسخة مجاناً.