النقد السيميائي عند منذر عياشي

الباحث

نورة أحمد إبراهيم الخميس

المشرف

محمد سالم سعد الله العبيدي

الجامعة

جامعة الموصل

الكلية / القسم

كلية الآداب / اللغة العربية

الشهادة

ماجستير

السنة

2023

لغة الرسالة

عربي

الكلمات المفتاحية

النقد السيميائي ; منذر عياشي ; السيميائية ; النقد العربي الحديث

The contemporary Arabic criticism involved a set of critical methodologies and the semiotic methodology was one of them. The semiotic criticism represents a methodology, conception and a science, which is indispensible as many scholars and researchers showed analytical effectiveness and an anatomical efficiency in the various specializations and humanitarian knowledge that were employed for all the textual discourses approaches and the treatment of all the human activities in terms of the analysis and interpretation so as to understand the sign and following up its denotations. Therefore, semiotics could penetrate several fields and domains that extend from the natural languages to the exploration of various social, cultural and aesthetic fashions. With this expansion, the tools of semiotics developed and adapted to the specialty of the field in which it operates in an endeavor to acquire an objective and scientific knowledge about the signifying human behavior and his symbolic interaction inside the society. Since more than a half of a century, the semiotic studies witness an expansion on different domains and various fields and this is due to the comprehensiveness of this science, which can deal with any domain from a semiotic perspective. Therefore, several journals and researches emerged in the fields of linguistic, rhetoric and aesthetics that rely on semiotics and all this imply that it has become a critical trajectory that pivots on acknowledged definitions and bases that can be applied efficiently and effectively to any domain in life. The contemporary Arabic criticism witnessed profound transformations due to the systematic critical methodologies that tackled the text and the semiotic criticism is considered one of the most important contemporary methodologies that contributed to create that qualitative move in the Arabic criticism. Therefore, the critics used it, reacted with it and adopted it in dealing with the old and modern texts until a new movement emerged that was devoted to the semiotic practice in the Arabic criticism. So, the semiotic criticism became a vital axis of the critical analysis and attention was drawn to scrutinize it and certain vision and conceptions emerged that call for adopting the positive interaction between the western critical heritage and the Arabic critical heritage through a relation that depends on the profound dialogue that aims at innovation and originality away from all cultural complexes and this motivated the Arab critics mobilize their knowledge and expertise for the purpose of a sound reception of them that goes along with the nature of the critical environment they came to it and the particularity of the Arabic text that is applied to it. Though, receiving it was not without certain challenges that were generated by this transportation from one critical environment to another which is different from the first in addition to the difficulties that are encountered by this criticism in its original domain. The starting point of the current research was from the books of Ayyashi in his detection to the semiotics criticism and the research was divided into an introduction (the semiotics criticism: the concept and Ishtighaal), in which the researcher dealt with semiotics in general and the semiotic criticism in particular and the limits of the term and the concept were discussed as well. Chapter one, entitled: (The semiotics criticism from the sign to the text) dealt with detecting the sign inside the text as it is considered a system of the interrelating signs. This chapter relied on Ayyashi's book entitled: (Semiotics: Semiology: A reading of the Arabic linguistic semiology) and it manifested the references on which the ctritic rested upon for Ayyashi. Due to the importance of this chapter, it was divided into two sections; the first (the systematic treatments) tackled Ayyashi dealing with the pattern, word and the sign as semiotic critical conceptions. Section two (Semiotics systems) dealt with the sign for Ayyashi from a special semantic semiotic point of view. Moreovr, chapter two (The semiotics criticism: from interrelation to methodology) discussed the semiotic criticism for Ayyashi and its relation with the surrounding critical frameworks and the development of this semiotic criticism thought to a group of the semiotic procedures in order to discover the sign inside the text. This chapter focused on Ayyashi's book entitled: (Semiotics: its orientations and concepts) as the book, which investigated methodology of the semiotic criticism and due to the importance of this methodology, this chapter was divided into two sections. Section one (the analytical orientation) dealt with the semiotic orientations and identifying their conception for Ayyashi concerning his agreement or disagreement with the general framework of the semiotic criticism related to it. section two (the methodological concepts), presented the most prominent concepts adopted by each orientation in terms of the data presented by the semiotic criticism in its methodology. Finally, the study was concluded with a conclusion in which the researcher presented the methodological trajectories reached by the research and the conclusion was followed by an appendix that mentions the most prominent literary works of Ayyashi and his biography.

طلب نسخة من الملف

الملفات غير منشورة على الموقع. اترك بياناتك وسيتواصل معك موظفو قسم الشؤون الثقافية والفنون لإرسال النسخة مجاناً.

الاسم

رقم الهاتف

البريد الإلكتروني

الغرض من الطلب (اختياري)

إرسال الطلب